药品检验领域能力验证统计方法研究

赵新玥, 陈华

中国药学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4) : 319-322.

PDF(1113 KB)
PDF(1113 KB)
中国药学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4) : 319-322. DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2017.04.016
论著

药品检验领域能力验证统计方法研究

  • 赵新玥1,2, 陈华2*
作者信息 +

Review on the Statistic Methods used in the Proficiency Testing in the Drug Control Field

  • ZHAO Xin-yue1,2, CHEN Hua2*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨可用于药品检验系统开展能力验证的数据统计方法。方法 结合国内外各行业开展实验室比对或能力验证活动时数据的处理情况,对统计方法进行梳理。讨论了经典统计方法中的Grubbs检验法和Dixon检验法,稳健统计方法中的四分位法和迭代法,总结了各统计方法的使用特点。结果 每一种统计方法均有其优点和适用条件。结论 建议根据检测结果的数据特征选择合适的统计方法。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore the statistical METHODS for proficiency testing in the drug control field. METHODS The statistical METHODS were sorted out with data processing used in inter-laboratory and proficiency testing by various industries both at home and abroad.The Grubbs test and Dixon test in classical statistical method were focused on as well as quartile method and iterative method in the robust statistical method, and the characteristics of the different statistic METHODS was summarized respectively.RESULTS Every method has its advantages and application conditions.CONCLUSION It is suggested that proper statistical method be chosen according to the data characteristics of the test RESULTS.

关键词

能力验证 / 统计方法 / 经典统计法 / 稳健统计法 / 药品检验

Key words

proficiency testing / statistical method / classical method / robust statistical method / drug test

引用本文

导出引用
赵新玥, 陈华. 药品检验领域能力验证统计方法研究[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2017, 52(4): 319-322 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2017.04.016
ZHAO Xin-yue, CHEN Hua. Review on the Statistic Methods used in the Proficiency Testing in the Drug Control Field[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2017, 52(4): 319-322 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2017.04.016
中图分类号: R917   

参考文献

[1] ISO/IEC17043:2010, General requirements for proficiency testing [S]. 2010:3-7.
[2] GUO D H. Effective countermeasures of laboratory proficiency testing[J]. Adv Measure Lab Manag(现代测量与实验室管理),2011,19(1):40-42.
[3] LI J,XIANG X H,ZHANG H Z. Comparison evaluation of statistical analysis methods for inter-laboratory comparison statistical analysis methods[J]. Chin Pharm J(中国药学杂志),2016,51(2):139-143.
[4] GB/T4883-2008. Statistical Interpretation of Data-Detection and Treatment of Outliers in the Normal Sample[S]. 2008:7. 2.
[5] LEI X P. Discussion on choice of suspicious data method-method of Grubbs[J]. Henan Building Materials(河南建材),2011,(2):163-165.
[6] JOSEF T P,LINSINGER J, KANDLER W, et al. The influence of different evaluation techniques on the results of interlaboratorycomparisions[J]. Accred Qual Assur,1998,13(3):322.
[7] BEN-GAL I. Outlier detection In:MAIMON O, ROCKACH L. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook:A Complete Guide for Practitioners and Researchers[M]. Norwell,Massachusetts,USA:Kluwer Academic Publishers,2005:1.
[8] GRAF H,HAMPEL F R,TALTER J D. The problem of unsuspecter serial correlations[J]. Lect Notes Stat,1984,26:127.
[9] HROMINSKI K C, TKACZ M. Comparison of outlier detection methods in biomedical data[J]. J Med Inf Technol,2010,16:89.
[10] SPRENT P. Data Driven Statistical Methods[M]. London:Chapman & Hall, 1998.
[11] ZHAO Z Z,LI Y C,GUO Y Z,et al. The integrated application of several statistical approaches in accuratecalculation of asphalt pavement loose paving coefficient[J]. Highway Engineering(公路工程), 2013,(1): 54-58.
[12] WANG J. Application of robust statistical method in comparison test of total hardness of the ground water quality[J]. Shanxi Architecture(山西建筑), 2009,(34):191-192.
[13] China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment. CNAS-GL02:2014. Guidance on Statistic Treatment of Proficiency Testing Results and Performance Evaluation[S]. 2014:Annex A.
[14] FU Y C,LUO Q. Discussion on statistical methods of analysis of interlaboratory comparison results[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part A:Physical Testing(理化检验:物理分册),2006,42(6):295-299.
[15] ZHOU R,DI Y A,YU Y,etal. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty of mercury in solid samples by pyrolysis atomic absorption spectropgotometry using quality control charting and robust statistics [J]. Chin J Inorg Anall Chem(中国无机分析化学),2015,5(2):1-8.
[16] LI Y W,SUN P Q,SUN H R. Comparison of two robust statistical analysis in proficiency testing and justification of rusults[J]. Metallurg Anal(冶金分析),2014,34(5):1-9.
[17] Analytical Methods Committee. Robuststatistics:A method of coping with outliers[R]. AMC technical brief,No. 6(2001),London:CRoyal Society of Chemistry(ISSN 1757-5958).
[18] GU T,ZHOU F,PU Z L,et al. Comparison of two evaluation methods in proficiency testing[J]. Chin J Health Lab Technol(中国卫生检验杂志),2015,25(3):450-451.
[19] HORWITZH W. Evaluation of analytical methods used for regulation of foods and drugs[J]. Anal Chem,1982,54(2):67-76.
[20] WANG L P,YANG M C,CHEN Z K,et al. Study on the proficiency testing program of pharmaceutical preparation analysis[J]. Acta Pharm Sin(药学学报),2012,47(6):769-772.
[21] TANG J T,FU B. Development of laboratory proficiency testing[J]. Chin J Inorgc Anal Chem(中国无机分析化学),2006,41(2):38-39.
[22] ZOU Z Y,ZHOU Z M,MENG Q H. Study on the statistical method in testing proficiency for the determination of gold content in gold alloy[J]. Adv Measure Lab Manag(现代测量与实验室管理),2013(4):19-21.
PDF(1113 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/